What's New

The latest additions to the campaign website:

Coming Up

Upcoming campaign events:

11 February 2007 to 7 March 2007
deadline for potential candidates to register out of other parties to run in 3 June 2008 P&F primary
13 November 2007 to 8 December 2007
deadline for potential candidates to be registered as Peace & Freedom to run in 3 June 2008 P&F primary

  

P&F Campaigns in San Bernardino County

Local Candidates

State Senate

There were no Peace and Freedom Party candidates for State Senate in San Bernardino County.

U.S. House of Representatives

There were no Peace and Freedom Party candidates for U.S. House of Representatives in San Bernardino County.

State Assembly

Jon Taleb of Joshua Tree ran for state Assembly in the 65th Assembly District, which includes south-west-central portions of San Bernardino County (a strip along the southern edge roughly one-fifth of the north-south distance going from the east-west midpoint to one-sixth of the way east of the western edge, including most of Yucaipa (most of the area either south of Yucaipa Boulevard or east of 5th Street), Running Springs, Big Bear Lake, Big Bear City, Morongo Valley, Yucca Valley, Joshua Tree and Twentynine Palms), as well as north-west-central portions of Riverside County. She came in third of three candidates, with 3,358 votes (2.9%) district-wide and 987 votes (3.2%) in San Bernardino County.

Local Non-partisan Offices

The webmaster is not aware of any endorsements by the San Bernardino County Peace and Freedom Party organization of any candidates for local non-partisan offices which were voted on in the November 7th general election.

Peace and Freedom Party Central Committees

No members of the Peace and Freedom Party Central Committees were elected from San Bernardino County in 2004. The webmaster is not aware of any candidates only for Central Committees from the county elected in the June 2006 primary election, but Jon Taleb became a member of the Central Committees when she was nominated for state Assembly.

Local Measures

The webmaster is not aware of any positions taken by the San Bernardino County Peace and Freedom Party organization on any county, municipal or regional measures that were on the ballot November 7th in San Bernardino County.

Regional Candidates

There were Peace and Freedom Party candidates in both of the Board of Equalization districts within San Bernardino County.

Richard Perry of Sacramento ran for Board of Equalization in the 2nd Board of Equalization District, which includes part of the southwestern corner of San Bernardino County (specifically, the communities of Chino Hills, Chino, Ontario (but not Upland or Rancho Cucamonga), Fontana, Rialto, Bloomington, Colton and Grand Terrace, and parts of the city of San Bernardino (more or less the areas west of Waterman Avenue and south of Highland Avenue)), as well as inland and eastern portions of Santa Barbara County, Ventura County, northern Los Angeles County, and inland areas from Kern County north to the Oregon border. He came in third of four candidates, with 75,419 votes (3.6%) district-wide and 4,521 votes (4.0%) in San Bernardino County.

Mary Lou Finley ran for Board of Equalization in the 3rd Board of Equalization District, which includes all of San Bernardino County except part of the south-western corner (specifically, it includes the communities of San Antonio Heights, Upland and Rancho Cucamonga (but not Ontario or Fontana), Muscovy, Highland, Redlands and Loma Linda and parts of the city of San Bernardino (more or less the areas east of Waterman Avenue or north of Highland Avenue), and everything north or east of there), as well as Riverside and Orange counties south to the Mexican border and the Palos Verdes peninsula and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in Los Angeles County. She came in third of three candidates, with 91,467 votes (4.5%) district-wide and 10,351 votes (4.8%) in San Bernardino County.

Statewide Candidates

The Peace and Freedom Party candidates for statewide partisan public offices were:

  • Governor: Janice Jordan (5th of 6 candidates on the ballot with 69,934 votes (0.8%) statewide, 3,539 votes (1.0%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Lieutenant Governor: Stewart Alexander (6th of 6 candidates with 43,319 votes (0.5%) statewide, 2,133 votes (0.6%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Secretary of State: Margie Akin (6th of 6 candidates with 91,483 votes (1.0%) statewide, 3,976 votes (1.1%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Treasurer: Gerald Sanders (6th of 6 candidates with 71,726 votes (0.8%) statewide, with 3,138 votes (0.9%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Controller: Liz Barrón (4th of 6 candidates with 212,383 votes (2.5%) statewide, in 3rd place with 10,615 votes (3.2%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Attorney General: Jack Harrison (5th of 5 candidates with 100,797 votes (1.1%) statewide, 4,555 votes (1.3%) in San Bernardino County)
  • Insurance Commissioner: Tom Condit (5th of 6 candidates with 187,618 votes (2.2%) statewide, in 3rd place with 7,365 votes (2.2%) in San Bernardino County)
  • U.S. Senator: Marsha Feinland (5th of 6 candidates on the ballot with 117,764 votes (1.3%) statewide, in 3rd place with 5,724 votes (1.7%) in San Bernardino County)

Statewide Measures

There were thirteen propositions on the statewide ballot November 7th, assigned proposition numbers 1A through 1E and 83 through 90. At its August 26th-27th State Convention, the Peace and Freedom Party took positions supporting Proposition 87 (oil severance tax to support alternative energy) and Proposition 89 ("Clean Money" public financing of candidates for state offices, limit corporate funding of ballot measure campaigns) and opposing the other eleven propositions.

  • Proposition 1A (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Transportation Funds." This measure eliminates the loopholes in provisions of the state constitution requiring gas sales tax money to be used for transportation. We don't think the legislature's hands should be tied to require the state to spend money on roads and transit even if it may be needed more urgently for education and health care. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 1A. Despite our opposition, Proposition 1A passed by a statewide vote of 6,400,587 (77.0%) Yes to 1,916,925 (23.0%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 266,528 (79.0%) to 71,092 (21.0%).
  • Proposition 1B (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Transportation Bonds." This measure authorizes the sale of $19.9 billion in bonds to be used for various transportation projects. We generally oppose bonds, that require ordinary people to pay taxes to those who can afford to invest in bonds, instead of taxing those who can afford to pay in order to meet social needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 1B. Despite our opposition, Proposition 1B passed by a statewide vote of 5,112,142 (61.4%) Yes to 3,218,657 (38.6%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 200,846 (59.5%) to 137,071 (40.5%).
  • Proposition 1C (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Housing Bonds." This measure authorizes the sale of $2.85 billion in bonds to be used for various housing-related programs. We generally oppose bonds, that require ordinary people to pay taxes to those who can afford to invest in bonds, instead of taxing those who can afford to pay in order to meet social needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 1C. Despite our opposition, Proposition 1C passed by a statewide vote of 4,814,850 (57.8%) Yes to 3,521,055 (42.2%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 181,107 (53.8%) to 155,797 (46.2%).
  • Proposition 1D (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "School and College Bonds." This measure authorizes the sale of $10.4 billion in bonds to be used for construction projects at K-12 schools and public universities and community colleges. We generally oppose bonds, that require ordinary people to pay taxes to those who can afford to invest in bonds, instead of taxing those who can afford to pay in order to meet social needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 1D. Despite our opposition, Proposition 1D passed by a statewide vote of 4,754,868 (56.9%) Yes to 3,602,055 (43.1%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 177,478 (52.7%) to 159,657 (47.3%).
  • Proposition 1E (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Flood Control Bonds." This measure authorizes the sale of $4.1 billion in bonds to be used for various flood control projects. We generally oppose bonds, that require ordinary people to pay taxes to those who can afford to invest in bonds, instead of taxing those who can afford to pay in order to meet social needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 1E. Despite our opposition, Proposition 1E passed by a statewide vote of 5,305,852 (64.2%) Yes to 2,962,546 (35.8%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 194,562 (58.2%) to 140,276 (41.8%).
  • Proposition 83 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Punishment for Sex Crimes." This measure increases the penalties for people convicted of sex crimes, prevents all registered sex offenders from ever living in a city, and requires life-long electronic monitoring of many registered sex offenders. This measure will waste money by increasing the number of people in prison and harassing low-risk ex-prisoners while failing to reduce crime. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 83. Despite our opposition, Proposition 83 passed by a statewide vote of 5,926,800 (70.5%) Yes to 2,483,597 (29.5%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 263,425 (77.3%) to 77,673 (22.7%).
  • Proposition 84 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Bonds for Water & Natural Resources." This measure authorizes the sale of $5.4 billion in bonds for water quality, flood control and parks. We generally oppose bonds, that require ordinary people to pay taxes to those who can afford to invest in bonds, instead of taxing those who can afford to pay in order to meet social needs. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 84. Despite our opposition, Proposition 84 passed by a statewide vote of 4,431,945 (53.8%) Yes to 3,807,005 (46.2%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 160,225 (47.7%) to 175,036 (52.3%).
  • Proposition 85 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Parental Notification about Abortion." This initiative was part of the anti-choice movement's strategy to chip away at legal abortion in the United States. It would have endangered the lives of teenage women who are afraid to tell their parents about preganancies. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 85. With our opposition, Proposition 85 was defeated by a statewide vote of 3,868,714 (45.8%) Yes to 4,576,128 (54.2%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 191,083 (56.2%) to 149,112 (43.8%).
  • Proposition 86 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Cigarette Tax." This measure would have quadrupled the state tax on cigarettes and used the money raised for various health and child development programs. We oppose cigarette taxes as regressive, making lower-income people pay relatively more than higher-income people. More lower-income people are smokers, and low-income smokers would pay a much higher part of their incomes in cigarette taxes than higher-income smokers. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 86. With our opposition, Proposition 86 was defeated by a statewide vote of 4,136,358 (48.3%) Yes to 4,425,689 (51.7%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 141,537 (41.1%) to 202,078 (58.9%).
  • Proposition 87 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Oil Severance Tax for Clean Energy." This measure would have created a new oil severance tax, raising $4 billion that would have been used for research, development and promotion of alternative clean and renewable energy. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote YES on 87. Despite our support, Proposition 87 was defeated by a statewide vote of 3,861,217 (45.4%) Yes to 4,635,265 (54.6%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 125,421 (36.5%) to 217,300 (63.5%).
  • Proposition 88 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Parcel Tax for Education." This measure would have created a new, regressive statewide parcel tax to be used for various programs in K-12 education. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 88. With our opposition, Proposition 88 was defeated by a statewide vote of 1,947,312 (23.3%) Yes to 6,396,956 (76.7%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 67,417 (19.9%) to 269,935 (80.1%).
  • Proposition 89 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Public Funding of Political Campaigns." This is the "Clean Money" initiative put on the ballot by the California Nurses Association. It would have provided public funding of campaigns for state elective offices to candidates who agree not to spend any other money and show broad support by collecting enough $5 "qualifying contributions" from potential constituents, funded by an increase in the corporate income tax. The measure would have also limited corporate contributions to campaigns for and against ballot measures. While this measure wasn't perfect (among other things, Demopublican candidates can much more easily qualify for more public funding than can progressive third party and independent candidates), it would still have been a big step forward to reducing the control of corporations and the rich over electoral politics. The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote YES on 89. Despite our support, Proposition 89 was defeated by a statewide vote of 2,124,728 (25.7%) Yes to 6,132,618 (74.3%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 60,250 (17.9%) to 275,004 (82.1%).
  • Proposition 90 (the voter pamphlet's summary, analysis, arguments for and against and rebuttals, and the full text (as PDF) are available): "Property Rights." This measure was a deceptive Trojan Horse. While promoted as protecting small property owners from losing their homes or businesses to well-connected developers, what it actually would have done was to restrict government's ability to take any action that might reduce the value of property (e.g., protect the environment, regulate land use, require fair treatment of tenants). The Peace and Freedom Party urged that you vote NO on 90. With our opposition, Proposition 90 was defeated by a statewide vote of 3,932,043 (47.6%) Yes to 4,324,722 (52.4%) No. In San Bernardino County, the vote was 177,097 (52.9%) to 157,701 (47.1%).
 

How you can help

Sign up now for the campaign email list